DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH / EN-IEAP-FS-01 · 10 PARTICIPANTS / 50 SEQUENCES
AXIALPROOF / RESEARCH LAB

COMPARATOR / AX-05 / AP-FS-01

Meridian
COMPARATOR FILE

The slowest onboarding and settlement profile in the panel, with two incomplete sequences.

ROLE

Comparator · AX-05

ACCESS

EEA retail accounts · EUR pairs

PAIR

BTC/EUR · €2,000 per sequence

01 / STUDY IDENTITY

Who was measured, and on what route.

Identity details are recorded for replicability. They are not a solvency opinion, a product endorsement or a statement about every customer’s experience.

Legal or operating entity
Meridian Crypto Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom · EU access via affiliate
Registration or authorisation
UK-registered cryptoasset firm; EU access through an affiliate
Account access tested
EEA retail accounts · EUR pairs
Traded pair
BTC/EUR
Withdrawal route
SEPA Credit Transfer
Fee model at the tested tier
0.14% maker / 0.24% taker at the tested tier; €3.00 SEPA withdrawal
Post-trade statement
Fee line present; execution timestamp absent on the summary

02 / ENDPOINTS

Six measurements, one sequence.

The median is reported with its interquartile range and the number of contributing observations. The rank is within the five-venue panel. For comparators, the final column repeats the paired difference from the study report: Baerx minus this venue.

Meridian endpoint record, AP-FS-01.
EndpointMedianIQRnRankBaerx − Meridian
Onboardinglower is better99.5 min92.8 min – 125.5 min405−81.5 min[−174.0 min, −68.0 min] · n=4
Round-trip costlower is better31.2 bps30.5 bps – 32.9 bps905−11.1 bps[−11.9 bps, −10.6 bps] · n=9
Fill latencylower is better292 ms276 ms – 311 ms905−124 ms[−128 ms, −113 ms] · n=9
Withdrawallower is better162.0 min136.0 min – 184.8 min8 (+1 censored)05−148.5 min[−178.0 min, −109.0 min] · n=8
Supportlower is better428.0 min387.5 min – 477.0 min1005−375.5 min[−436.5 min, −322.0 min] · n=10
Statementhigher is better6.10 / 105.90 / 10 – 6.50 / 10905+3.30[+2.90, +3.70] · n=9

A censored case is excluded from the median but retained in the completion count. An interval crossing zero is compatible with no difference at this sample size.

03 / FINDINGS

What the record shows.

F01

Median time to an onboarding decision was 99.5 minutes, including one participant who stopped after a second document request at 190 minutes.

F02

Median round-trip cost was 31.2 bps; median submit-to-fill latency was 292 ms.

F03

Median withdrawal settlement among completed cases was 162 minutes; one withdrawal remained pending at the 24-hour censor.

F04

Median support first response was 428 minutes; median statement completeness was 6.1 out of 10. Eight of ten sequences completed.

04 / BOUNDARIES

Where the file stops.

B01

Two incomplete sequences do not establish a failure rate; they are reported as observed outcomes.

B02

The venue's UK registration was not treated as evidence of EU customer protection.

B03

The study did not test the affiliate's onboarding route separately from the main application.

05 / PARTICIPANT VOICES

What the panel said about Meridian.

Collected in the post-task debrief, translated where necessary, and checked by the participant. Length edited; sentiment not edited.

Meridian's withdrawal was still processing the next day. The money arrived on the second day, but the status page never changed.
P08
Regular user · SEExisting account · Meridian
observation ↗
The onboarding queue at Meridian passed three hours, and then it asked for another document. I stopped there.
P10
First-time buyer · PTNew account · Meridian
observation ↗

06 / NEXT

Compare the file with the other four.

The venue files are written from the same observation table. No file adjusts another venue’s numbers, and no file adds a score that the study report does not publish.